Grateful Dead -Grateful Fools Day 3 lp set April 1,1988
  $   41

 


$ 41 Sold For
May 25, 2010 Sold Date
May 18, 2010 Start Date
4   Number Of Bids
  USA Country Of Seller
eBay Auctioned at
 
save auction  

Description

   PLEASE READ COMPLETE ITEM DESCRIPTION & GRADING BEFORE BIDDING

BUY IT NOW GETS FREE "USA" SHIPPING
SHIPPING IS NOT $4.00
THIS ITEM CANNOT BE SHIPPED AT EBAY'S $4.00 LIMIT

__________________________

A WORD ABOUT MY SHIPPING CHARGES

THERE IS A LOT MORE THAN JUST THE POSTAGE COSTS TO SHIP MOST OF THE ITEMS I SELL.  MOST OF THESE ITEMS REQUIRE:

1- ONE (1) OR MORE PROTECTIVE VINYL SLEEVES THAT I PURCHASE NEW
2- TWO (2) PROTECTIVE CARDBOARD STIFFENERS THAT I PURCHASE NEW
3- SPECIALISED SHIPPING BOXES THAT I HAVE TO PURCHASE NEW TO PROFESSIONALLY PACKAGE & SHIP YOUR ITEMS SAFELY AND WELL PROTECTED AGAINST ROUGH POSTAL HANDLING.
4- THE TIME IT TAKES TO DO ALL OF THE ABOVE

PLEASE TAKE THIS INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN YOU RATE MY SHIPPING CHARGES.

THANK YOU.

NORTH AMERICA: $7.99 USD for USPS MEDIA MAIL

EUROPE/UK: $29.99 USD for USPS MAIL 

SEE GOLDMINE RECORD GRADING INFORMATION at VERY BOTTOM

NOW THAT the SMALL PRINT is OUT of the WAY

 
Up for Auction is a:
 
1989 - 3 RECORD SET - VINYL PRESSING
OF
THE GRATEFUL DEAD

GRATEFUL FOOL'S DAY
LIVE at The MEADOWLANDS April 1, 1988

ON GLORIOUS & BEAUTIFUL VINYL
 
CLUB 51 RECORDS
 DG - 003

Set List:
Mississippi Half-Step
Jack Straw
To Lay Me Down
Ballad of a Thin Man
When Push Comes to Shove
New Minglewood Blues
Cumberland Blues
Deal

China Cat Sunflower
I Know You Rider
Estimated Prophet
Eyes of the World
drums
The Other One
Wharf Rat
Throwin' Stones
Not Fade Away

Brokedown Palace

RATED a 4.2 out of a possible 5 on the GRATEFUL DEAD'S WEBSITE

SO FORGET ABOUT REISSUES & CDs

HERE'S THE "REAL THING"
on
GLORIOUS VINYL


_______________________________________________________
SOME HISTORY BEHIND THE MUSIC:
 

Reviewer:   - - May 6, 2009
Subject: Brilliant!
My 1st ever was the night before and if I wasn't just a 15 y.o. "Touch Of Gray" head, I no doubt would have gone back for this. The second set is absolutely perfect; the 1st is no slouch either. I can give this 5 even with the 80s rasp in Jerry's voice because they're all spot on front to back. 

Reviewer:  - - July 29, 2008
Subject: brokedown palace
The brokedown palace is one of the best versions you'll ever hear....



fantastic set, and really underrated by the archive IMO.

Reviewer:  - - April 28, 2008
Subject: nice sound...
this was a really very fine performance, very solid playing. sections of the eyes reach brilliance. 5 overall for the show,  ..and the memories.

Reviewer: - - April 25, 2008
Subject: You're spot on Dark Hollow...
CAUTION!!! East Coast Smoker!!!!This is one of the most outstanding, original,latter -day Dead first sets you will hear. It just don't STOP!!!! Miss. 1/2 and Jack are like the cork comin' off the bottle....To Lay Me Down>Ballad of a Thin Man is almost to hot to handle....SIZZLING!!!And a Cumber-land-of-the-lost-your mind!! The rest of the show just smokes, but after all the years of listening to this show---the first 4 songs have never left me anything other than totally blown away. NOTE: 5/3/1987 has the greatest Lil' Bunny Foo Foo of all time... ....check it out!

Reviewer: - - April 21, 2008
Subject: Feels Like The First Time
As I listen to this, I suddenly remember I was at this one and had forgotten how good it was. Thanks, too tasty. Really features Jerry in late 80's resurgence. Vocals are a touch raspy, but it only adds to the overall effect (especiall on a heart rending Lay Me Down). The band playing from start to finsh is outstanding. Perhaps my 5-star rating is a tad biased, but because I haven't listened to this in the 20 years since seeing it live, I feel I can be somewhat objective. 




____________

ALL 3 Vinyl Records: Near Mint-

VISUAL INSPECTION UNDER BRIGHT LIGHT/DAYLIGHT GRADING

GLOSSY VINYL RETAINING  GLORIOUS SHEEN

WITH 

ONLY THE VERY SLIGHTEST PAPER SCUFFING 

Cover: VG++

NO RIPS - NO TEARS - NO WRITING - FRONT BOTTOM RIGHT  CORNER BENT

PLEASE SEE PHOTOS

-----------------------------

Here is a chance to own a copy of one of the GREATEST JAM BANDS ever!

____________________________________________________

Sorry - No Returns

Check out the photos carefully, use them to determine if  the item meets your standards ... ratings vary greatly from person to person

so

BE SURE

you want this item before bidding ....

all sales final

All Sales Final

ALL SALES FINAL !!!

PAYMENT MUST BE RECEIVED

WITHIN

5 DAYS AFTER AUCTION CLOSE!!

(or item will be relisted)

I Ship Within 48 hrs. of Payment

BUY IT NOW

GETS
FREE "USA" SHIPPING

NORTH AMERICA:

$7.99 USD for USPS MEDIA MAIL

EUROPE/UK:
 
$29.99 for USPS MAIL 

GOOD LUCK !!

all sales final

All Sales Final

ALL SALES FINAL !!!


GOLDMINE STANDARD for RECORD GRADING

 
THE TRUTH BEHIND THE GRADES
 
Most of the time, LPs are sold with two grades — one for the record and one for the cover. We list only one grade, however, because with some exceptions, albums without covers are worthless, and covers without the accompanying record are worthless. If an album is graded VG for the cover and VG+ for the record, add the two values together and divide by 2 to get a rough estimate of the value of a “mixed-grade” LP.

Most records are graded visually. This is because most record dealers have lot of records — hundreds of thousands in some cases — and they don’t have the time to play their entire stock. That said, some defects are easy to see, such as scratches and warps. Others are subtle, such as groove wear from using a cheap or poorly aligned tone arm. It has been our experience that older LPs (1950s to about 1971) tend to play better than they look, and newer LPs (at least until 1989) tend to play worse than they look.
When grading your records, do so under a strong light. Look at everything carefully, and then assign a grade based on your overall observations.
______________________________________________________


Here are the standard grades for record albums, from best to worst.

SEALED ALBUMS  
Still-sealed albums can — and do — bring even higher prices than those in our listings. However, you must be careful when paying a premium for sealed LPs of any kind for several reasons:

1.  They may have been re-sealed.
2.  The records may not be in Near Mint condition.
3.  The record inside may not be the original or most-desirable pressing.
4.  Most bizarre of all, the wrong record my be inside. (I’ve had this happen to me; I opened a sealed album by on MCA artist only to find a record by a different MCA artist inside! Fortunately, I didn’t pay a lot of or that sealed LP. I would have been quite upset if I had!)

MINT (M)
These are absolutely perfect in every way. Often rumored but rarely seen, Mint should never be used as a grade unless more than one person agrees that the record or sleeve truly is in this condition.

There is no set percentage of the Near Mint value these can bring; it is best negotiated between buyer and seller.

NEAR MINT (NM OR M-)
A good description of a NM record is “it looks like it just came from a retail store and it was opened for the first time.” In other words, it’s nearly perfect.

Many dealers won’t use a grade higher than this, implying (perhaps correctly) that no record or sleeve is ever truly perfect.

Near mint records are shiny and free of visible defects. No writing, stickers, other markings or spindle marks appear on the label. No major factory defects are present; a record and label obviously pressed off center is not Near Mint.

If played, an NM record will do so without surface noise. Near Mint records don’t have to be “never played”; a record used on an excellent turntable can remain NM after many plays if the disc is properly cared for.

NM covers have no creases, ring wear or seam splits of any kind.

These are high standards, and they are not on a sliding scale. A record or sleeve from the 1950s must meet the same standards as one from the 1990s or 2000s to be Near Mint!

It is estimated that no more than 2 to 4 percent of all records remaining from the 1950s and 1960s are truly Near Mint. This is why they fetch such high prices, even for more common items. They must meet these standards to qualify.
 
VERY GOOD PLUS (VG+) OR EXCELLENT (E)
A good description of a VG+ Record is “except for a couple of minor things, this would be Near Mint.”

Most collectors, especially those who want to play their records, will be happy with a VG+ record, especially if it is toward the high end of the grade, (sometimes called VG++ or E+).

VG+ records may show some slight signs of wear, including light scuffs or very light scratches that do not affect the listening experience. Slight warps that don’t affect the sound are OK. Minor signs of handling are OK, too, such as telltale marks around the center hole, so long as repeated playing has not misshapen the hole. There may be some very light ring wear or discoloration, but it should be barely noticeable.

VG+ Covers should have only minor wear. A VG+ cover might have some very minor seam wear or a split (less than one inch long) at the bottom, the most vulnerable locataion. Also, a VG+ cover may have some defacing, such as a cut-out marking. Covers with cut-out markings can never be considered Near Mint.

VERY GOOD (VG)

Many of the imperfections found on a VG+ Record are more obvious on a VG record. That said, VG records — which usually sell for no more than 25 percent of a an NM record — are among the biggest bargains in record collecting, because moost of the “big money” goes for more perfect copies. For many listeners, a VG record or sleeve will be worth the money.

VG records have more obvious flaws than their counterparts in better shape. They lack most of the original gloss found on factory-fresh records. Groove wear is evident on sight, as are light scratches deep enough to feel with a fingernail.

When played, a VG record has surface noise, and some scratches may be audible, especially in soft passages and during a song’s intro and ending. But the noise won’t overpower the music otherwise. Minor writing, tape or a sticker can detract from the label. Many collectors who have jukeboxes will use VG records in them and not think twice. They remain a fine listening experience, just not the same as if it were in better shape.

VG covers will have many signs on human handling. Ring wear in the middle or along the edges of the cover, where the edge of a record would reside, is obvious; it may appear on all three sides, thought it won’t be obvious upon looking. Someone might have written on it or stamped a price tag on it, too.

GOOD (G), GOOD PLUS (G+) OR VERY GOOD MINUS (VG-)

Lower-grade records go for 10 to 15 percent of the Near Mint value, if you are lucky.

Good does not mean bad! The record still plays through without skipping, so it can serve as filler until something better comes along. But it has significant surface noicse and groove wear. The label is worn and exhibits significant ring wear, heavy writing or obvious damage caused by tring to remove tape or stickers and failing miserably.

A Good to VG- cover has ring wear to the point of distraction, has seam splits obvious on sight and may have even heavier writing, such as huge radio station letters written across the front to deter theft.

If the item is common, it’s probably better to pass it up. But if you’ve been seeking it for a long time, get it cheap and look to upgrade.

POOR (P) AND FAIR (F)

Poor and Fair records go for 0 to 5 percent of the Near Mint value, if they go at all.

More likely, they end up going in the trash. Records are cracked, impossibly warped or skip and/or repate when an attempt is made to play them. Covers are so heavily damaged that you almost want to cry.

Only the most outrageously rare items ever sell for more than a few cents in this condition — again, if they sell at all.


price rating