THE ROLLING STONES LET IT BLEED MONO 1A 1A ACETATE NO RESERVE
  £   350
  $   464

 


£ 350 Sold For
Dec 5, 2015 Sold Date
Nov 28, 2015 Start Date
22   Number Of Bids
  Great Britain Country Of Seller
eBay Auctioned at
 
save auction  

Description

THE ROLLING STONES.

LET IT BLEED.

1A 1A  MONO ACETATE.

Rare photo of Keith and Brian.

RARE.

This is an original 1969 mono acetate of the Rolling Stones classic LP

Let it bleed. To those that might not know, acetates are the master recording

of the artists work. In other basic words they are the stage prior to the record

being made. Many contain alternate mixes or different versions of the songs

that make it to the final cut of the LP.

This one is identicle to the Let It bleed LP so after this the go ahead would be

given for the records to be pressed. Its at this stage that the acetates are supposed

to be destroyed because they have served their purpose. That`s one reason they

are so rare.Another reason is they only ever make a handful of them in the first

place.

Acetates are not records and are designed to be played only a few times to

see how they sound before thousands of records are pressed. So acetate

collectors generally play them once and record them to tape. Continued playing

of acetates is detrimental to the acetate lacquer surface.I have played this one 3

times and it sounds magnificent.Theres some hissing right at the start of Gimme Shelter

but that goes after about 20 seconds then the LP is great all the way.

It has a few hairlines but they don't affect the sound. Double click the pictures

and you will see an unsightly mark that crosses 9363 which is the technical

jargon Decca used for side 1. Decca jargon for side 2 is 9364 .

We know its mono LK 5025 as it says on the lables, and the Stereo acetate would

be SKL 5025. There is nothing at all in the deadwax area because this is prior to

the go ahead for records to be pressed. The original inner sleeve has some yellowing

but that's nothing . The white generic card sleeve is not original I simply added that

to house the inner . The master sleeve I also added because acetates are supposed to be housed in these so the don't get paper marks .The record lables are spotlessly clean.

This is due to the fact that most acetate collectors rarely even handle them.

They are not like records and if you were to drop an acetate it would shatter

like glass.They are delicate and unusual and rare in the extreme.They are about

5 or 6 times the weight of a vinyl (the inside of them is metal alloy).They

are cold to touch like marble and nothing smells like an acetate.

They have an unmistakeable chemical smell that I can only describe as glorious.

As you can see this Acetate comes with a rare picture of Brian and Keith with

two sisters Barbara and June "1963 our Lewisham house", as it states in the picture

To Alan (That's me),

Barbara was the first girlfriend of Pete the very well known Stones collector

who I bought this from.


SERIOUSLY RARE.

a penny start and

NO RESERVE.


Postage is £8.50 special delivery inland.

Germany is £12.10 recorded first class.

USA is £15.50 tracked and insured.























On 03-Dec-15 at 16:51:59 GMT, seller added the following information:

The mark that I described in the listing as unsightly has no affect on the way this acetate plays.

None at all. I think its due to the acetate cellulose lacquer ,it simply is not vinyl, its totally different.

What I mean is if you were to put the very same mark we have here onto a vinyl record my guess is

it would probably cause clicks or some kind of noise distortion. Acetate lacquer is very strange material

and although it may be prone to mark more easily than vinyl, i think its softer on the needle so theres no

sound problems at all from this mark. Just a little insight into how strange a material acetate lacquer is double

click the pictures of the master sleeve i house this acetate in . Note the yellowing, i think this is some king of oil

that over the years has transferred to the master sleeve cellophane.



price rating
( 2 votes)